<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HIP Check licensing expired in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301786#M78715</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Curious if you followed this article.. or something else?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClVACA0" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClVACA0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-03T00:06:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HIP Check licensing expired</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301681#M78702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I thought that HIP check licensing expiration (trial version), would cause any rules on the FW - using a HIP check profile column to not match.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Instead, it appears that it causes the firewall to simply not care about that column at all.... and allow traffic through, on the rule with the HIP check profile specified, even if you are out of compliance.&amp;nbsp; Do others have experience with this?&amp;nbsp; I guess this makes sense, just expected different behavior.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 18:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301681#M78702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sec101</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T18:00:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HIP Check licensing expired</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301786#M78715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Curious if you followed this article.. or something else?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClVACA0" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClVACA0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301786#M78715</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-03T00:06:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HIP Check licensing expired</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301893#M78731</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for posting good link for HIP profile configuration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 16:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/301893#M78731</guid>
      <dc:creator>MP18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-03T16:26:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HIP Check licensing expired</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/302432#M78817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nope, just set up some HIP checks checking against internal programs, which definitely worked.&amp;nbsp; I wonder if there is a grace period after one of these license expire?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 20:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/hip-check-licensing-expired/m-p/302432#M78817</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sec101</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-06T20:10:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

