<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic proxy_arp_pvlan_feature request in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/proxy-arp-pvlan-feature-request/m-p/304512#M79162</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Palo Alto support team&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As I have post my question in the community, I come to conclusion that the Palo Alto firewall does not support the feature explained in the post--&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/General-Topics/proxy-arp-pvlan/m-p/302528#M78834" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/General-Topics/proxy-arp-pvlan/m-p/302528#M78834&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The design case is used the the private vlan scenario where the upstream router/firewall with promiscuous port should reply to the isolated vlan clients in order to inspect the traffic between the isolated VLANs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the Linux kernel, this feature is called the proxy_arp_pvlan which is disabled by default. The path to enable this feature is under the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/proxy_arp_pvlan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In other vendor terms, it is supported with the following name:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco == ARP alias&lt;BR /&gt;Fortinet == Proxy-ARP&lt;BR /&gt;Juniper SRX == proxy arp unrestricted&lt;BR /&gt;Mikrotik == local-proxy-arp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As the Palo Alto firewall is one the best firewall in the industry, I hope that it supports this feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any feedback is much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:01:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>seek_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-20T09:01:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>proxy_arp_pvlan_feature request</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/proxy-arp-pvlan-feature-request/m-p/304512#M79162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Palo Alto support team&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As I have post my question in the community, I come to conclusion that the Palo Alto firewall does not support the feature explained in the post--&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/General-Topics/proxy-arp-pvlan/m-p/302528#M78834" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/General-Topics/proxy-arp-pvlan/m-p/302528#M78834&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The design case is used the the private vlan scenario where the upstream router/firewall with promiscuous port should reply to the isolated vlan clients in order to inspect the traffic between the isolated VLANs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the Linux kernel, this feature is called the proxy_arp_pvlan which is disabled by default. The path to enable this feature is under the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/proxy_arp_pvlan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In other vendor terms, it is supported with the following name:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco == ARP alias&lt;BR /&gt;Fortinet == Proxy-ARP&lt;BR /&gt;Juniper SRX == proxy arp unrestricted&lt;BR /&gt;Mikrotik == local-proxy-arp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As the Palo Alto firewall is one the best firewall in the industry, I hope that it supports this feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any feedback is much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:01:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/proxy-arp-pvlan-feature-request/m-p/304512#M79162</guid>
      <dc:creator>seek_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-20T09:01:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proxy_arp_pvlan_feature request</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/proxy-arp-pvlan-feature-request/m-p/304543#M79170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/128202"&gt;@seek_2&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As per the post 2 weeks ago you'll need to reach out to your local SE to have him add this feature request for you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you done so ? If so, please share the FR# and post it here so other members of the community can add their vote to it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers !&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Kiwi.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ConnectiveDocSignExtentionInstalled" data-extension-version="1.0.4"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 12:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/proxy-arp-pvlan-feature-request/m-p/304543#M79170</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-20T12:43:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

