<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA820 high availability configuration in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311729#M80659</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes the port speed and duplex must match on both devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClIbCAK" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClIbCAK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-18T19:42:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA820 high availability configuration</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311723#M80655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm needing some clarification on one aspect of deploying a 2nd redundant PA820 in high availability mode.&amp;nbsp; I currently have my 2nd 820 deployed with the management interface configured.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My first question is.&amp;nbsp; When setting up my 2nd PA i discovered that I only have 10gb sfp's for interfaces that I'm matching on my current PA.&amp;nbsp; The question is will this cause a conflict of some kind between the two devices.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know in the past when deploying a pair of cisco asa 5515's that i needed to match the sfp's on both ends.&amp;nbsp; Anyone able to confirm that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311723#M80655</guid>
      <dc:creator>danoman2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-18T19:30:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA820 high availability configuration</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311729#M80659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes the port speed and duplex must match on both devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClIbCAK" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClIbCAK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311729#M80659</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-18T19:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA820 high availability configuration</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311739#M80661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick reply.&amp;nbsp; That make sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa820-high-availability-configuration/m-p/311739#M80661</guid>
      <dc:creator>danoman2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-18T20:17:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

