<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Aggregate interface without LLDP/LACP in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface-without-lldp-lacp/m-p/312167#M80739</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;this is not expected &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; how is your switch aggregate configured?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-20T08:11:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Aggregate interface without LLDP/LACP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface-without-lldp-lacp/m-p/311889#M80685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an aggregate interface from PA to cisco having 2 physical interfaces, I don't have LLDP or LACP enabled in the aggregate interface (LLDP is not enabled globally as well as in interface level). But I can see that the aggregate interface is up and passing traffic. the strange thing happens is that when I add more than 2 subinterfaces in the aggregate link, the third and later links are not passing traffic. It would be great if someone can explain this behavior. Is it normal or I am missing something?.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface-without-lldp-lacp/m-p/311889#M80685</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abdul_Razaq</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-19T10:58:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggregate interface without LLDP/LACP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface-without-lldp-lacp/m-p/312167#M80739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;this is not expected &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; how is your switch aggregate configured?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/aggregate-interface-without-lldp-lacp/m-p/312167#M80739</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-20T08:11:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

