LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

myky — Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:26:01 GMT

Hi All,

PA-3060, PAN-OS 7.1.17

Please see below:

LACP:

**********************************************************************************
AE group: ae1
Members: Bndl Rx state Mux state Sel state
ethernet1/17 yes Current Tx_Rx Selected
ethernet1/18 no Current Attached Selected
Status: Enabled
Mode: Active
Rate: Fast
Max-port: 2
Fast-failover: Disabled
Pre-negotiation: Disabled
Local: System Priority: 32768
System MAC: 00:1b:17:00:01:01
Key: 48
Partner: System Priority: 10
System MAC: 00:01:00:01:00:01
Key: 3000
Port State
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interface Port
Number Priority Mode Rate Key State
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ethernet1/17 32 32768 Active Fast 48 0x3F
Partner 36866 20 Active Fast 3000 0x3F

ethernet1/18 33 32768 Active Fast 48 0x0F
Partner 40962 21 Active Fast 3000 0x07

Port Counters
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interface LACPDUs Marker Marker Response Error
Sent Recv Sent Recv Sent Recv Unknown Illegal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ethernet1/17 11390156 11277328 0 0 0 0 0 0
ethernet1/18 11394781 11281914 0 0 0 0 0 0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: ethernet1/18, ID: 33
Link status:
Runtime link speed/duplex/state: 10000/full/up
Configured link speed/duplex/state: auto/auto/auto
MAC address:
Port MAC address 00:1b:17:00:01:21
Aggregate group : ae1
Operation mode: layer3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physical port counters read from MAC:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rx-broadcast 8685
rx-bytes 10465767928
rx-multicast 11788416
rx-unicast 6900843
tx-broadcast 2313
tx-bytes 10372413228
tx-multicast 11395077
tx-unicast 6893704
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hardware interface counters read from CPU:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bytes received 1495677902
bytes transmitted 1412989548
packets received 11664365
packets transmitted 11395077
receive incoming errors 0
receive discarded 0
receive errors 0
packets dropped 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I assume the next step is the switch port check?

Thanks,

Myky

Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

SutareMayur — Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:26:52 GMT

@mykyYes, please cross check ports at switch end.

Mayur

Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

BPry — Wed, 26 Feb 2020 22:19:43 GMT

@myky,

The fact that one of your ports are simply failing negotiation points to a switch configuration issue, so I would have that verified to actually be configured correctly. If you post the interface configurations here we can likely tell you if something is misconfigured.

I also wanted to point out that it's time to start thinking about a software update on this firewall. 7.1.25 has been out for a long time and is currently the recommended release within that branch, since you have active security vulnerabilities that aren't patched in 7.1.16 I would plan that sooner rather than later. You will also want to update to 8.1 or later before March 29, 2020 when 7.1 goes end of life

Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

myky — Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:26:34 GMT

@BPry cheers! Yeas, we are aware of the EoL. We have moved to 8.1.x release for now.

I will check switch, thanks guys

topic Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy in General Topics

LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy

Re: LACP not active, negotiation failed. One member is not happy