<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Many-to-one NAT on same port /app? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317685#M81650</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;thanks. I thought of the same solution but wanted to get an opinion before bringing into prod.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SThatipelly</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-20T14:30:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Many-to-one NAT on same port /app?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317147#M81518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 4 public IP addresses that are needed to NAT to a one single private IP server in DMZ. They all listen on same port and same application. Anyway I can get this done without greatly impacting users?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:53:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317147#M81518</guid>
      <dc:creator>SThatipelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-18T19:53:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Many-to-one NAT on same port /app?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317161#M81522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would just take 4 NAT policies along with security policies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a.a.a.a -&amp;gt; nat to -&amp;gt; i.i.i.i&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b.b.b.b -&amp;gt; nat to -&amp;gt; i.i.i.i&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c.c.c.c -&amp;gt; nat to -&amp;gt; i.i.i.i&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;d.d.d.d -&amp;gt; nat to -&amp;gt; i.i.i.i&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:45:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317161#M81522</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-18T21:45:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Many-to-one NAT on same port /app?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317685#M81650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;thanks. I thought of the same solution but wanted to get an opinion before bringing into prod.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/many-to-one-nat-on-same-port-app/m-p/317685#M81650</guid>
      <dc:creator>SThatipelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-20T14:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

