<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324271#M82794</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How is the inter-vsys connection currently setup?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; and the proposal fix look like?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-22T13:30:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324204#M82780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We got a Palo Alto 5050 active/passive HA configuration with two vsys with a lot of inter-vsys traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our DP1 is running at 100% during working hours.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am convinced that the problem is that inter-vsys traffic can't be offloaded to hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i configure physical interface 1 and 2 to vsys1 (L3) and physical interface 3 and 4 to vsys 2 (L3), connect them with a physical cable, aggregate these two links (port-channel) and route inter-vsys traffic over that physical link. Would that be a good practice? Now traffic can be offloaded to HW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank u for your feedback!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 08:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324204#M82780</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelBolleboom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T08:20:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324254#M82790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/137577"&gt;@MarcelBolleboom&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your environment only have 2 vsys&amp;nbsp; and it won't get any bigger.&amp;nbsp; That is one way to resolve the inter-vsys performance issue.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have a diagram that can help us understand the problem?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you able to identify the traffic pattern?&amp;nbsp; Is there a specific zone/subnet in one vsys that all the systems from the other vsys need to access?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:06:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324254#M82790</guid>
      <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T12:06:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324256#M82791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank u for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All internet traffic from the LAN uses the inter-vsys connection (red) for internet. Best way to tackle this would be to consolidate the two vsys to one but that would be a large operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Inter vsys.png" style="width: 546px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25296i471AF2DC47AC887F/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Inter vsys.png" alt="Inter vsys.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324256#M82791</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelBolleboom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T12:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324271#M82794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How is the inter-vsys connection currently setup?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; and the proposal fix look like?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324271#M82794</guid>
      <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T13:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324276#M82796</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Current: Direct inter vsys routing between two vsys on same physical device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;New: Using 4 interfaces (2 per vsys) and aggregate them to form a 2 Gbit link (UTP). SFP 10 Gbit interfaces are all in use. Traffic won't exceed 2 Gbit. Make it a L3 connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, direct cables from one interface to another between two vsys on same physical device.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324276#M82796</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelBolleboom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T14:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324277#M82797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks!&amp;nbsp; let's us know if the change helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324277#M82797</guid>
      <dc:creator>nextgenhappines</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T14:08:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-5050 8.1.11 Inter Vsys traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324279#M82798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i will&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-5050-8-1-11-inter-vsys-traffic/m-p/324279#M82798</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelBolleboom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-22T14:17:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

