<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Policy rules organization in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-rules-organization/m-p/324657#M82863</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tricky question. If you are running code 9 or 9.1 then there is a counter for each policy so you can see which ones get hit more often. A few things to remember is that the PAN evaluates policies top to bottom left to right. So the order of the policies matter. What I do is put the stuff I know is a block, e.g. dynamic block lists, at the top so they dont sneak through. Then order the policies of highest use closer to the top without over riding a more specific policy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically take your time and think it out. Do one or a few at a time so as not to cause confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-23T21:10:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Policy rules organization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-rules-organization/m-p/324517#M82841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hello Everyone hope everything is doing well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;questions for the experts on palo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have 260 rules on my palo alto environment and they are subdivided in zones and i would like to make things more organized on my rules&amp;nbsp; .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;question is the rules more high used on the palo should be always first ? like more verbose rules or it doesn't matter where they are they will be no performance issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matheus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:29:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-rules-organization/m-p/324517#M82841</guid>
      <dc:creator>Support_IT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T12:29:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy rules organization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-rules-organization/m-p/324657#M82863</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tricky question. If you are running code 9 or 9.1 then there is a counter for each policy so you can see which ones get hit more often. A few things to remember is that the PAN evaluates policies top to bottom left to right. So the order of the policies matter. What I do is put the stuff I know is a block, e.g. dynamic block lists, at the top so they dont sneak through. Then order the policies of highest use closer to the top without over riding a more specific policy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically take your time and think it out. Do one or a few at a time so as not to cause confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-rules-organization/m-p/324657#M82863</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T21:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

