<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BGP - PA2020 - utilization in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11373#M8374</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given that full BGP route table is over 300K routes, PA-2020 cannot handle that many routes. The max for PA-2020 is around 2500 entries in the forwarding table. Refer to PA-2000 series specsheets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.paloaltonetworks.com/literature/datasheets/PA2000_Specsheet.pdf"&gt;http://www.paloaltonetworks.com/literature/datasheets/PA2000_Specsheet.pdf &lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better to have routes filtered coming to the PA device or have another router which is more dedicated for the task to handle the full BGP feed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-11T06:30:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP - PA2020 - utilization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11369#M8370</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking to deploy a new router for switching from a single provider to a multihomed setup including some peering. I have PA-2020 for that purpose and wondering whether it will handle full BGP for a few years considering growth of routing tables ? Do you have any experience with BGP on PA-2020 ? How is processor load looks ?&lt;BR /&gt;I have 20 Mbit of traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;What do you think generally about BGP on NGF ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 07:41:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11369#M8370</guid>
      <dc:creator>LCMember2683</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-04T07:41:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP - PA2020 - utilization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11370#M8371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you interested in working with the full internet routing table?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11370#M8371</guid>
      <dc:creator>ncampagna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-07T21:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP - PA2020 - utilization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11371#M8372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried setup BGP only with one peer on PA2020 but Management CPU was permanently 100%. I didn't add BGP routes to the routing table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:39:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11371#M8372</guid>
      <dc:creator>LCMember2683</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-10T09:39:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP - PA2020 - utilization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11372#M8373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The firewall doesn't support the full internet routing table.&amp;nbsp; Is there any way you can receive a filtered set of routes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11372#M8373</guid>
      <dc:creator>ncampagna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-10T16:11:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP - PA2020 - utilization</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11373#M8374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given that full BGP route table is over 300K routes, PA-2020 cannot handle that many routes. The max for PA-2020 is around 2500 entries in the forwarding table. Refer to PA-2000 series specsheets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.paloaltonetworks.com/literature/datasheets/PA2000_Specsheet.pdf"&gt;http://www.paloaltonetworks.com/literature/datasheets/PA2000_Specsheet.pdf &lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better to have routes filtered coming to the PA device or have another router which is more dedicated for the task to handle the full BGP feed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-pa2020-utilization/m-p/11373#M8374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-11T06:30:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

