<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Antivirus Policy - Action based on Severity Level in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/antivirus-policy-action-based-on-severity-level/m-p/358621#M87900</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/126353"&gt;@Matko-DoJ&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So first and foremost, I would recommend upgrading to the latest antivirus content update. 3509-4020 was giving us a lot of false positives that were reported to PAN, with 3510-4021 which was pushed out yesterday those issues have gone away with signature updates to address the false-positive reports.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, I would always recommend reporting false-positives over lowering your security posture. You can temporarily exclude virus exceptions where you actually need to due to false-positives until they get updated, but I wouldn't just lower my security due to them. Exclude the threat IDs causing a problem and report them to TAC so the signatures can get updated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now to your direct question, this would be a feature request that you raise with your SE. I'm not aware of a feature request already being present for this feature, but if there was one it's your SE's job to find it so they can add your vote to it or create a new request.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-24T17:00:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Antivirus Policy - Action based on Severity Level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/antivirus-policy-action-based-on-severity-level/m-p/358361#M87874</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have Antivirus policy in place and we are seeing many, what we believe are, false positives. Mostly on PDF files. Since number is rather high, reporting each one seems a bit excessive. What they all have in common is their severity which is MEDIUM.&lt;BR /&gt;With that said, our approach would be to deny only HIGH and CRITICAL severity event and allow the rest.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is I can't find the option to block viruses based on Severity Level (the same option exists for AntiSpyware for example). And virus severity level is clearly visible in Threat Logs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would this qualify as a Feature Request or is it already available ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/antivirus-policy-action-based-on-severity-level/m-p/358361#M87874</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matko-DoJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-23T08:54:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Antivirus Policy - Action based on Severity Level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/antivirus-policy-action-based-on-severity-level/m-p/358621#M87900</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/126353"&gt;@Matko-DoJ&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So first and foremost, I would recommend upgrading to the latest antivirus content update. 3509-4020 was giving us a lot of false positives that were reported to PAN, with 3510-4021 which was pushed out yesterday those issues have gone away with signature updates to address the false-positive reports.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, I would always recommend reporting false-positives over lowering your security posture. You can temporarily exclude virus exceptions where you actually need to due to false-positives until they get updated, but I wouldn't just lower my security due to them. Exclude the threat IDs causing a problem and report them to TAC so the signatures can get updated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now to your direct question, this would be a feature request that you raise with your SE. I'm not aware of a feature request already being present for this feature, but if there was one it's your SE's job to find it so they can add your vote to it or create a new request.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/antivirus-policy-action-based-on-severity-level/m-p/358621#M87900</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-24T17:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

