<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Palo Alto OSPF routing./wild card mask configuration. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-ospf-routing-wild-card-mask-configuration/m-p/360458#M88100</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Day.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found myself chuckling at your comment.&amp;nbsp; It was very good. Seeing that Cisco likes to "do their own thing".. PANW follows the correct standard... &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you answer is, as you stated:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the Palo Alto all we need to do is defined the interface with the &lt;STRONG&gt;correct subnet mask&lt;/STRONG&gt; (correct is good.&amp;nbsp; :P) and that should take care of the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the smiles.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-03T13:34:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Palo Alto OSPF routing./wild card mask configuration.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-ospf-routing-wild-card-mask-configuration/m-p/358933#M87937</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For OSPF configuration on the Cisco router, we normally define a wild card mask.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e.g. network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What this configuration tells the Cisco router is to form OSPF neighbor with all IP address that being with 1.1.1.x IP address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we have any option of configuring such a wild card mark on the Palo Alto firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or on the Palo Alto all we need to do is defined the interface with the correct subnet mask and that should take care of the configuration? I believe the later option is how it works.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone help cofirm?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 04:46:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-ospf-routing-wild-card-mask-configuration/m-p/358933#M87937</guid>
      <dc:creator>nson2139</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-27T04:46:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto OSPF routing./wild card mask configuration.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-ospf-routing-wild-card-mask-configuration/m-p/360458#M88100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Day.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I found myself chuckling at your comment.&amp;nbsp; It was very good. Seeing that Cisco likes to "do their own thing".. PANW follows the correct standard... &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you answer is, as you stated:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the Palo Alto all we need to do is defined the interface with the &lt;STRONG&gt;correct subnet mask&lt;/STRONG&gt; (correct is good.&amp;nbsp; :P) and that should take care of the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the smiles.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-ospf-routing-wild-card-mask-configuration/m-p/360458#M88100</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-03T13:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

