<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PA and ASA n route mode in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366072#M88652</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the below topology&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA and&amp;nbsp; ASA are in routed mode .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first question is the design is valid?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am facing a problem in this design&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA says the secondary is failed&amp;nbsp; ,primary asa says the secondary and dmz zone interface failed&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pa-cisco.jpg" style="width: 761px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28842iCC1E45BF8348875E/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pa-cisco.jpg" alt="pa-cisco.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>simsim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-28T09:39:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA and ASA n route mode</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366072#M88652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the below topology&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA and&amp;nbsp; ASA are in routed mode .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first question is the design is valid?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am facing a problem in this design&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA says the secondary is failed&amp;nbsp; ,primary asa says the secondary and dmz zone interface failed&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pa-cisco.jpg" style="width: 761px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28842iCC1E45BF8348875E/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pa-cisco.jpg" alt="pa-cisco.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366072#M88652</guid>
      <dc:creator>simsim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-28T09:39:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA and ASA n route mode</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366110#M88660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per diagram you can still optimize your design with full redundancy towards ISP(CE) side via the layer-2 switch and configure the route or path monitor and provide routing redundancy with static and also firewall redundancy with PAN firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as per given info here how you are doing secondary and DMZ failover.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per understand I can say that if you are monitoring inside /DMZ links then if anyone link fails from primary PA firewall to ASA then you can shift traffic to the secondary firewall (PAN) and secondary ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suresh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366110#M88660</guid>
      <dc:creator>SureshReddyM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-29T09:41:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA and ASA n route mode</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366367#M88694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ASA interfaces that communicate for failover need to be on the same L2 segment. ASA also needs a failover interface. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Unless you've left some things out of the drawing, I wouldn't expect this to work. Consider putting some L2 devices between the layers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:53:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-and-asa-n-route-mode/m-p/366367#M88694</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmfalconer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-30T20:53:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

