topic Re: Using public range of IPs in General Topics

Using public range of IPs

ce1028 — Tue, 01 Dec 2020 16:53:57 GMT

I have a bit of a silly question to ask but my mind is drawing a blank on this. If you have a connection from the ISP, say the static IP range is 14.1.1.0/30....their router is 14.1.1.1 and the PA FW will be 14.1.1.2. Simple enough but what if they also give you a usable range of IPs to use, say 15.1.1.0/27. To use these IPs , would you need to assign the external interface an additional IP on 15.1.1.0/27 subnet, or could you just create NAT rules that NAT traffic to IPs in that range?

HiRe: Using public range of IPs

SureshReddyM — Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:12:35 GMT

Hi,

You can use those new prefixes IP's for NAT pool and also bind it to internal servers and you give direct to server or routers aswell. And for routing you have provide reachability and also u have to advertise towards ISP for reachability in & out Through given ISP network.

Best Regards,

Suresh

Re: HiRe: Using public range of IPs

ce1028 — Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:19:59 GMT

@SureshReddyM

Thanks. So does it make sense to assign one of the IPs as an additional IP of the external interface? This way firewall knows that range is part of untrust zone?

Re: HiRe: Using public range of IPs

SureshReddyM — Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:22:15 GMT

Yes. Make sure that those prefixes have to reachable in and out using routing and adv. With protocols or static route if single home connection.

Regards,

Suresh

Re: Using public range of IPs

raji_toor — Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:45:27 GMT

@ce1028 You don't need to assign any IP form the new range to your interface if your ISP is advertising it for you over the internet.

Just add a static route for the new IP range towards the external interface. Rest is usual Nat and security policy.

That is ISP is advertising that this 15.1.1.0/27 subnet can be reached through your link. You also point it towards your external link and use the IP's from that range in NAT and security policies.

Re: Using public range of IPs

ce1028 — Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:33:16 GMT

@raji_toor @SureshReddyM

Thank you both!

Re: Using public range of IPs

reaper — Wed, 02 Dec 2020 21:48:00 GMT

you don't even need to add routes (unless the IP range lives on a different interface than where 0.0.0.0/0 goes out of)

When you create NAT rules that use this new subnet, the firewall will perform proxy arp for the IP addresses (or entire subnet) you configure in the NAT rule. Adding a 'destination interface' in the NAT rule will help the firewall identify which interface these proxy-ARP packets need to go out of