<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Enabling IPv6 on untrusted Ethernet1/1 interface brings down IPv4 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367456#M88837</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried working with Palo Alto support but there hours don't match with my schedule.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I decided to start using IPv6 on my local LAN and WAN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I setup a DHCP server using MS Server and created a scope. Devices on the network are getting two IPv6 address.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured the IPv6 on PA-220 and hit the enable button and committed and immediately lost the IPv4 network from Xfinity. I currently get my IPv4 via DHCP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After about a week of this I contacted support and open up a case via the Palo Alto web portal. They couldn't answer the basic question, why enabling IPv6 would bring down IPv4. Even if I don't have anything configured it brings down the IPv4. Just enabling it brings down the interface. I know I'm getting IPv6 from Xfinity. I did a packet capture.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bryanscott_0-1607189276233.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28969i2035D7058C3EF14E/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="bryanscott_0-1607189276233.png" alt="bryanscott_0-1607189276233.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;During this time, I configured a Cisco RV340 and have no issues with both IPv4 and IPv6 working on the untrusted interface. I could continue to use the Cisco RV340 but it's not a NGF.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If needed I could provide configurations, but seeing I can get it&amp;nbsp; to work on a Cisco small business router I wonder what is going on. I was on version 10.x software. I downgraded to 9.1.x just to see if it was a problem with the code. No change.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I contacted Xfinity and they say both can work at the same time. They also provided the Prefix to use. It's in the screenshot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bryanscott</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-05T17:37:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling IPv6 on untrusted Ethernet1/1 interface brings down IPv4</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367456#M88837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried working with Palo Alto support but there hours don't match with my schedule.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I decided to start using IPv6 on my local LAN and WAN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I setup a DHCP server using MS Server and created a scope. Devices on the network are getting two IPv6 address.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured the IPv6 on PA-220 and hit the enable button and committed and immediately lost the IPv4 network from Xfinity. I currently get my IPv4 via DHCP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After about a week of this I contacted support and open up a case via the Palo Alto web portal. They couldn't answer the basic question, why enabling IPv6 would bring down IPv4. Even if I don't have anything configured it brings down the IPv4. Just enabling it brings down the interface. I know I'm getting IPv6 from Xfinity. I did a packet capture.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="bryanscott_0-1607189276233.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28969i2035D7058C3EF14E/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="bryanscott_0-1607189276233.png" alt="bryanscott_0-1607189276233.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;During this time, I configured a Cisco RV340 and have no issues with both IPv4 and IPv6 working on the untrusted interface. I could continue to use the Cisco RV340 but it's not a NGF.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If needed I could provide configurations, but seeing I can get it&amp;nbsp; to work on a Cisco small business router I wonder what is going on. I was on version 10.x software. I downgraded to 9.1.x just to see if it was a problem with the code. No change.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I contacted Xfinity and they say both can work at the same time. They also provided the Prefix to use. It's in the screenshot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367456#M88837</guid>
      <dc:creator>bryanscott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-05T17:37:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enabling IPv6 on untrusted Ethernet1/1 interface brings down IPv4</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367598#M88856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can't explain why IPv4 goes down, but be aware that Palo does not support DHCPv6 prefix delegation, which is kinda mind blowing.&lt;BR /&gt;Been requested for a long time, but seems like IPv6 doesn't get any attention.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367598#M88856</guid>
      <dc:creator>erikda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-07T11:20:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enabling IPv6 on untrusted Ethernet1/1 interface brings down IPv4</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367671#M88871</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I replaced the Netgear CM1100 modem with a Arris T25 modem and the modem does not reboot after I enable IPv6.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found a post on Netgear's support website that others are having the same problem with different firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/enabling-ipv6-on-untrusted-ethernet1-1-interface-brings-down/m-p/367671#M88871</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bryans1367</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-07T22:43:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

