<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PBF and ipsec in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378367#M89468</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;adding another PBF should do the trick (if the first bpf is set to a path monitor profile with fail-over as the action)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-07T13:51:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBF and ipsec</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378154#M89448</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HQ Network and Remote Network location are always through MPLS&lt;BR /&gt;PBF is configured with path monitoring for forwarding via MPLS and if mpls fails&lt;BR /&gt;traffic will be through ipsec_1 tunnel according to pbf created in palo alto.&lt;BR /&gt;How to configure in palo alto if both ipsec1 and mpls down so that traffic should pass through ipsec_2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/23567"&gt;@jdelio&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/16592"&gt;@Remo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 17:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378154#M89448</guid>
      <dc:creator>bit_byte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-06T17:38:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBF and ipsec</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378367#M89468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;adding another PBF should do the trick (if the first bpf is set to a path monitor profile with fail-over as the action)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378367#M89468</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-07T13:51:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBF and ipsec</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378371#M89470</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7608"&gt;@reaper&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create a PBF for MPLS and configure the monitor failover&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;create a PBF for IPSEC-1 and configure&amp;nbsp;the monitor failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then create&amp;nbsp; PBF for IPSEC-2. (in this case, if mpls link and IPsec-1 link down then traffic will fail back to ipsec-2 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it right ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:02:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378371#M89470</guid>
      <dc:creator>bit_byte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-07T14:02:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBF and ipsec</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378532#M89486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the pbf rules can be set sequentially and will each perform monitoring to verify if they should be active, as long as 1 is active, 2 will not be hit, when 1's monitor fails 2 takes over and 3 will not be hit, as soon as 2's monitor fails it too will stop functioning and 3 will take over as last resort&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lastly you can still resort to a static route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf-and-ipsec/m-p/378532#M89486</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-08T00:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

