<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN from  Palo to Cloud – Physical Interface or Loopback? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382379#M89842</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I typically use a loopback interface to save a physical port. I don't believe there is a right/wrong answer here just depending on your requirements and preference. I hope this helps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ThomasYarger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-27T16:20:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN from  Palo to Cloud – Physical Interface or Loopback?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382352#M89840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Calibri" color="#000000"&gt;Just wondering what is best practice for this?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Calibri" color="#000000"&gt;We have a /29 on our outside interface. We are using the IP assigned for client NAT translation.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Calibri" color="#000000"&gt;Over the coming months we’ll be configuring several VPNs to the same cloud provider. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Calibri" color="#000000"&gt;Should these terminate via a loopback or just on the physical interface and we should add an address to the physical interface?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382352#M89840</guid>
      <dc:creator>Networksteam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-27T15:52:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN from  Palo to Cloud – Physical Interface or Loopback?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382379#M89842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I typically use a loopback interface to save a physical port. I don't believe there is a right/wrong answer here just depending on your requirements and preference. I hope this helps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382379#M89842</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasYarger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-27T16:20:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN from  Palo to Cloud – Physical Interface or Loopback?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382516#M89851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use Global Protect via a loopback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I will use the physical outside interface for VPN, and keep it simple.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-from-palo-to-cloud-physical-interface-or-loopback/m-p/382516#M89851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Networksteam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-28T08:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

