<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Static group, that has 2 dynamic groups as members, used in decryption policy? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-group-that-has-2-dynamic-groups-as-members-used-in/m-p/385429#M90144</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a static group with 2 dynamic groups as its members, that is in turn used as the source object in a no-decrypt rule. I have discovered that this does not work; decrypt still happens. However If I use the dynamic groups directly as sources in the no-decrypt rule it works as expected. This same static group DOES work fine in the security policy, as a source for an outbound SSH rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this expected behavior perhaps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're on v9.0.9. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ccvega</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-11T15:46:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static group, that has 2 dynamic groups as members, used in decryption policy?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-group-that-has-2-dynamic-groups-as-members-used-in/m-p/385429#M90144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a static group with 2 dynamic groups as its members, that is in turn used as the source object in a no-decrypt rule. I have discovered that this does not work; decrypt still happens. However If I use the dynamic groups directly as sources in the no-decrypt rule it works as expected. This same static group DOES work fine in the security policy, as a source for an outbound SSH rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this expected behavior perhaps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're on v9.0.9. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-group-that-has-2-dynamic-groups-as-members-used-in/m-p/385429#M90144</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccvega</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T15:46:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static group, that has 2 dynamic groups as members, used in decryption policy?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-group-that-has-2-dynamic-groups-as-members-used-in/m-p/385514#M90157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not sure if its expected behavior. However in the past I have stayed away from nested groups as it has caused me many issues especially with Active Directory as well as other products.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:05:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/static-group-that-has-2-dynamic-groups-as-members-used-in/m-p/385514#M90157</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T22:05:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

