<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Policy Based Forwarding in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386628#M90283</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a&amp;nbsp; guest wifi vlan 10.25.x.x that needs to be routed out to a second ISP. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AP--&amp;gt;WLC--Palo Alto FW--&amp;gt;MPLS/VPLS-Router--&amp;gt;L3Switch--&amp;gt;ISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The vlan will each have a sub-interface and gateway 10.25.x.1 assigned on firewall in its own guest zone and virtual router.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The virtual router will have a default gateway 0.0.0.0 to a next hop&amp;nbsp; 10.25.x.2 layer 3 switch SVI where ISP is connected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nat will be performed on the L3 switch,&amp;nbsp; 10.25.x.x addresses pool to a public IP before routing out to internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Will the policy based forwarding work &amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I assume I can forward the same traffic out the same sub-interfaces ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Also if I performed the NAT on the Palo Alto before routing out to ISP over a private network is that acceptable from security point of view&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:57:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MistryJa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-18T17:57:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Policy Based Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386628#M90283</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a&amp;nbsp; guest wifi vlan 10.25.x.x that needs to be routed out to a second ISP. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AP--&amp;gt;WLC--Palo Alto FW--&amp;gt;MPLS/VPLS-Router--&amp;gt;L3Switch--&amp;gt;ISP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The vlan will each have a sub-interface and gateway 10.25.x.1 assigned on firewall in its own guest zone and virtual router.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The virtual router will have a default gateway 0.0.0.0 to a next hop&amp;nbsp; 10.25.x.2 layer 3 switch SVI where ISP is connected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nat will be performed on the L3 switch,&amp;nbsp; 10.25.x.x addresses pool to a public IP before routing out to internet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Will the policy based forwarding work &amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I assume I can forward the same traffic out the same sub-interfaces ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Also if I performed the NAT on the Palo Alto before routing out to ISP over a private network is that acceptable from security point of view&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:57:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386628#M90283</guid>
      <dc:creator>MistryJa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T17:57:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386662#M90286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So there are 2 ways to perform what want to do.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2 ISPs = 2 virtual routers, which is a single default gateway/route per virtual router.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Willthe policy based routing work in this scenarios ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PBF is used to SUPERSEDE the routing table, to ignore it.. and follow the PBF rules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So... if you only have a single virtual router, then you would need a PBF rule, to tell the guest wireless to ignore the existing default gateway.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have 2 virtual routers, then the "guest wireless virtual router" would be different that your "corporate network" and because of this, NO need to use PBF.&amp;nbsp; You would WANT your guests to get an address with a dg of 10.25.x.1, whose on default gateway is 10.25.x.2...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) I assume I can forward the same traffic out the same sub-interfaces ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can route whatever traffic you want, and engineer the firewall do to your bidding.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tongue:"&gt;😛&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Also if I performed the NAT on the Palo Alto before routing out to ISP over a private network is that acceptable from security point of view ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perfectly acceptable to use to use security policies and NAT policies on your FW.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, are you planning to use SrcNAT or DestNAT (you did not state the specifics)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember that security polices for DNAT rules follow "Pre/Post/Pre" or PreNat SRC Zone,&amp;nbsp; POST Nat DestZone, PRENAT Public IP (because we do not NAT until AFTER the security policy approves the traffic is permitted)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What other questions can we answer for you?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386662#M90286</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T18:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Policy Based Forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386674#M90289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Steve,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/policy-based-forwarding/m-p/386674#M90289</guid>
      <dc:creator>MistryJa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-19T08:05:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

