<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WildFire Analysis Exclusions? smbv3 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wildfire-analysis-exclusions-smbv3/m-p/389880#M90660</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would consider opening a case with support if you see this as a false positive. This could help out others having a similar issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:27:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-08T22:27:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WildFire Analysis Exclusions? smbv3</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wildfire-analysis-exclusions-smbv3/m-p/389466#M90627</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Seeing a lot of false positives with WildFire for application ms-ds-smbv3, specifically for PE+MSDOCX files. Is there anyway to just exclude ONLY this application from our Wildfire? I'd really hate to have to create a 2nd WildFire Security Profile and another Policy Rule just to exclude 1 application type. If we do have to create a 2nd WildFire Analysis Security Profile, can we just exclude only this ms-ds-smbv3 application?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any information.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pan_rags.png" style="width: 686px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/30208i5BF48501C9AFB502/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pan_rags.png" alt="pan_rags.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/objects/objects-security-profiles-wildfire-analysis.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/objects/objects-security-profiles-wildfire-analysis.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClTSCA0" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClTSCA0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wildfire-analysis-exclusions-smbv3/m-p/389466#M90627</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rags</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-05T19:33:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WildFire Analysis Exclusions? smbv3</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wildfire-analysis-exclusions-smbv3/m-p/389880#M90660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would consider opening a case with support if you see this as a false positive. This could help out others having a similar issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:27:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wildfire-analysis-exclusions-smbv3/m-p/389880#M90660</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-08T22:27:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

