<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/390002#M90678</link>
    <description>&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="p"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;PAN-137663&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="p"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Fixed a cosmetic issue where misleading App-ID and rule shadowing warnings populated after a commit.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fixed in 9.0.11 hopefully this is the one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>laurence64</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-09T14:07:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/333601#M84232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a customer who has upgraded to 9.0 and they get shadow rule warnings since the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All the shadowing rules are more generic with any/any for source and destination, but with source user restrictions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The shadowed rules have more specific source/destination values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Traffic is hitting the shadowed rules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The same rules weren't triggering any warnings under 8.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone experienced a similar issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andrea&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:24:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/333601#M84232</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreaHuszka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T09:24:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/333637#M84236</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I have the same thing with upgrade in 9.0.8 (from 8.1.x) but I haven't created a case yet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(For example: src.user ignored)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/333637#M84236</guid>
      <dc:creator>k-lesne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T14:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/335989#M84663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any update on this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/335989#M84663</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-30T09:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/336038#M84666</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It appears to be a bug, a fix is targeted for&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;9.0.11 and 9.1.5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/336038#M84666</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreaHuszka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-30T13:41:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/336343#M84717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have a reference for this being noted for 9.0.11?&amp;nbsp; Been doing some digging and not finding anything calling this out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/336343#M84717</guid>
      <dc:creator>TStiteler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-01T15:28:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/389970#M90672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do we have the bug ID provided by Palo Alto TAC for this issue? Ta.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/389970#M90672</guid>
      <dc:creator>HonoAl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-09T12:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shadow Rule Warning after upgrade</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/390002#M90678</link>
      <description>&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="p"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;PAN-137663&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="p"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Fixed a cosmetic issue where misleading App-ID and rule shadowing warnings populated after a commit.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fixed in 9.0.11 hopefully this is the one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/shadow-rule-warning-after-upgrade/m-p/390002#M90678</guid>
      <dc:creator>laurence64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-09T14:07:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

