<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Palo Alto Routing &amp;amp; Licenses Realtionship? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392192#M90872</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have PA850 in a active passive cluster. I have static routes and default gateway and no routing protocol.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It ignores certain specific static routes and always directs traffic to default route which is resulting in communication failure. Please advise.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aataro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-18T17:53:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Palo Alto Routing &amp; Licenses Realtionship?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392018#M90834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have PA850 just configured but licenses is not yet activates. I see strange age routing behavior. Is it because licenses is not activated?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:53:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392018#M90834</guid>
      <dc:creator>aataro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-18T12:53:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto Routing &amp; Licenses Realtionship?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392141#M90862</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No the license dont affect routing. I would double check the setup of interfaces/routing/policies and make sure everything is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392141#M90862</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-18T16:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto Routing &amp; Licenses Realtionship?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392168#M90870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you better describe the behavior? If you are talking about OSPF, remember PAN-OS defaults to the RFC2328 implementation which can give you unexpected path selection for External routes if you are used to working in an cisco IOS environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392168#M90870</guid>
      <dc:creator>SebRupik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-18T16:51:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto Routing &amp; Licenses Realtionship?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392192#M90872</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have PA850 in a active passive cluster. I have static routes and default gateway and no routing protocol.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It ignores certain specific static routes and always directs traffic to default route which is resulting in communication failure. Please advise.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392192#M90872</guid>
      <dc:creator>aataro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-18T17:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo Alto Routing &amp; Licenses Realtionship?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392227#M90875</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello again,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you share the output from the CLI of the active firewall of the following commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show interface all&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show routing route&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;show routing path-monitor&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you also tell us the destination prefixes which are not being routed correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-alto-routing-amp-licenses-realtionship/m-p/392227#M90875</guid>
      <dc:creator>SebRupik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-18T22:40:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

