<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failover in NAT in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393719#M91041</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't get what exacltly you want by reading the description. Have you tested path monitoring?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClG7CAK" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClG7CAK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:54:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nikoolayy1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-25T06:54:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover in NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393691#M91036</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a configuration to balance two NAT destinations, in the Translated Address we have a group with the two IP destination&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need to performing a failover if NAT # 1 192.168.251.21 stops working, passing to NAT # 2 192.168.251.22.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the IP # 1 is turned off, so that it sends the traffic to IP # 2, it is still trying to go out on IP # 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this configuration possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393691#M91036</guid>
      <dc:creator>RodrigoB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-25T01:51:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover in NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393719#M91041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't get what exacltly you want by reading the description. Have you tested path monitoring?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClG7CAK" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClG7CAK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:54:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393719#M91041</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikoolayy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-25T06:54:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover in NAT</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393793#M91049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if i understond your question correctly, you already have route balancing mechnism configured ,&amp;nbsp;if so seems like both traffic matching the same NAT rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT rules need to have what to diffrentiate in "Traffic Matching" between them, that means for example you will need different destionations zones or destionations interfaces...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/failover-in-nat/m-p/393793#M91049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abdul-Fattah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-25T10:50:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

