<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Configuration checks against CIS security benchmarks in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414153#M93058</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/185152"&gt;@TimMcQuinn&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/quickplay-solutions-articles/cis-benchmark-quick-assess/ta-p/390774" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/quickplay-solutions-articles/cis-benchmark-quick-assess/ta-p/390774&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-18T14:03:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Configuration checks against CIS security benchmarks</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414136#M93054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello All, Do any of you compare local firewall or Panorama configurations against CIS benchmarks for security compliance&amp;nbsp;checks ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Either using an existing tool to check Firewall compliance with the CIS (Centre for Internet&amp;nbsp;Security benchmarks) recommendations or manually using show merged config / show config ? The Palo BPA does expose some of the required information but not all and we are looking for a less manual solution.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414136#M93054</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimMcQuinn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T12:33:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Configuration checks against CIS security benchmarks</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414153#M93058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/185152"&gt;@TimMcQuinn&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/quickplay-solutions-articles/cis-benchmark-quick-assess/ta-p/390774" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/quickplay-solutions-articles/cis-benchmark-quick-assess/ta-p/390774&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414153#M93058</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T14:03:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Configuration checks against CIS security benchmarks</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414213#M93066</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/185152"&gt;@TimMcQuinn&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you already use a vulnerability scanning tool, check if there is already support for the CIS benchmark. For example with the vulnerability scanners from Tenable you can also check for this benchmark.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:33:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/configuration-checks-against-cis-security-benchmarks/m-p/414213#M93066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-18T22:33:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

