<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Bind 2 separate IPSEC tunnels to separate ISPs in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bind-2-separate-ipsec-tunnels-to-separate-isps/m-p/418352#M93655</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to setup a separate IPSEC tunnel to a new ISP while keeping the rest on the old ISP.&amp;nbsp; I am doing this as a test.&amp;nbsp; My issue is lack of connection.&amp;nbsp; The message I get from the logs is that it try's the connection then I get another saying its deleting possible stale.&amp;nbsp; Is there something I am missing?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Both the IKE and Crypto are setup correctly on both ends and there is no issue with the passkey.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&amp;nbsp; Thank you!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jheiner801</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-09T22:10:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bind 2 separate IPSEC tunnels to separate ISPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bind-2-separate-ipsec-tunnels-to-separate-isps/m-p/418352#M93655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to setup a separate IPSEC tunnel to a new ISP while keeping the rest on the old ISP.&amp;nbsp; I am doing this as a test.&amp;nbsp; My issue is lack of connection.&amp;nbsp; The message I get from the logs is that it try's the connection then I get another saying its deleting possible stale.&amp;nbsp; Is there something I am missing?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Both the IKE and Crypto are setup correctly on both ends and there is no issue with the passkey.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated.&amp;nbsp; Thank you!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bind-2-separate-ipsec-tunnels-to-separate-isps/m-p/418352#M93655</guid>
      <dc:creator>jheiner801</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-09T22:10:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bind 2 separate IPSEC tunnels to separate ISPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bind-2-separate-ipsec-tunnels-to-separate-isps/m-p/418359#M93656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sounds like you are going to have routing issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My suggestion would be to create a PBF rule, (policy based forwarding) so that this new VPN will be go over the 2nd ISP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PBF rules supersede the routing table, so this would resolve any routing issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bind-2-separate-ipsec-tunnels-to-separate-isps/m-p/418359#M93656</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-09T22:46:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

