<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ike Scan Against GlobalProtect Gateway in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ike-scan-against-globalprotect-gateway/m-p/419646#M93805</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Globalprotect is an SSL based portal structure that uses SSL to negotiate connectivity. only after a user is connected will the agent switch to ipsec, so there is no regular IKE to this setup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you want to scan ike/ipsec, create an ike gateway and&amp;nbsp; vpn tunnel object on the interface&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-15T12:52:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ike Scan Against GlobalProtect Gateway</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ike-scan-against-globalprotect-gateway/m-p/417845#M93598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm testing (starting) my ethical hack skills and testing our GlobalProtect Gateways for vulnerabilities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used the Windows ike-probe and Kali Linux ike-scan against a Cisco gateway with VPN services running. The ike-scan results are what I expected in receiving a response or acknowledgment of 1 returned handshake with the available ciphers. The ike-probe results were expected as well, with recv_notify on most ciphers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran the same scans against a Palo Alto GlobalProtect Gateway with Portal and Gateway configured. This Gateway is working with GlobalProtect clients in IPSec mode and default settings. The ike-scan and ike-probe results are negative as compared to the Cisco gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the Palo Alto Gateway more secure? Am I missing a command option with both scans?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:00:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ike-scan-against-globalprotect-gateway/m-p/417845#M93598</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeff6strings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-08T16:00:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ike Scan Against GlobalProtect Gateway</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ike-scan-against-globalprotect-gateway/m-p/419646#M93805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Globalprotect is an SSL based portal structure that uses SSL to negotiate connectivity. only after a user is connected will the agent switch to ipsec, so there is no regular IKE to this setup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you want to scan ike/ipsec, create an ike gateway and&amp;nbsp; vpn tunnel object on the interface&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ike-scan-against-globalprotect-gateway/m-p/419646#M93805</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-15T12:52:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

