<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: security rule placement in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/423607#M94191</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi BPry,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apologies for jumping into this thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please could help me in understanding whether do we need any rule for web-browsing or https in order to allow the above applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I understand is that they should work without the http and https rule.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mahmoodm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-31T07:50:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287232#M76694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an outbound web-browsing rule, rule criteria is source zone (trust) destination zone (untrust) , application (web-browsing, ssl), service (tcp-80, tcp-443)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are going to create more application specific rules, does it makes more sense to put those rules AFTER the outbound web-browsing rule.&amp;nbsp; For instance, say you're going to create a 4 additional rules, 1 for dropbox, 1 for facebook/twitter, 1 for youtube, and another for ms-update.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Would it be a best/common practice to put these 4 rules after the outbound web-browsing rule?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To me it makes sense, since a lot of these applications have dependancy on web-browsing/ssl, but wanted to ask anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2019 23:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287232#M76694</guid>
      <dc:creator>ce1028</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-08T23:48:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287251#M76695</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/71649"&gt;@ce1028&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It doesn't matter. When the application shifts away from web-browsing to, say dropbox-base, the entire rulebase gets re-analysed and the location of the policy allowing dropbox-base won't matter as long as it is above any deny policy that would match the traffic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 03:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287251#M76695</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T03:15:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287385#M76708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Personaly, I would put the more granular rules before less granualr rules. Just my thinking though.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287385#M76708</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobinClayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T14:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287395#M76711</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; Yes agreed, it does not matter, but I was more curious as to what the best practice is from a processing standpoint&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Very good point on all the rules getting re-evaluated.&amp;nbsp; Is it safe to say, the most hit rules are better to be towards the top of the rulebase then, or due to firewall performance specs, it doesn't really matter?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:54:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287395#M76711</guid>
      <dc:creator>ce1028</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T15:54:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287398#M76712</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/71649"&gt;@ce1028&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Due to firewall processing specs it really doesn't matter if the rules are located towards the top or towards the bottom. The amount of time that it takes for a firewall with thousands of security policies to match the very first entry in the security rulebase versus the very last is not measurable without the use of full debug logging, and even then it's a negligable amount. Essentially PAN has accounted for any latency due to actually processing the policies by enforcing platform policy limits.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287398#M76712</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T16:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287401#M76713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:29:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/287401#M76713</guid>
      <dc:creator>ce1028</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T16:29:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: security rule placement</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/423607#M94191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi BPry,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apologies for jumping into this thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please could help me in understanding whether do we need any rule for web-browsing or https in order to allow the above applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I understand is that they should work without the http and https rule.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:50:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-rule-placement/m-p/423607#M94191</guid>
      <dc:creator>mahmoodm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-31T07:50:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

