<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High Availability in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12863#M9428</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have dual switches on both sides you are in a good position for reliability in hardware failure modes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You do need to be sure that your PA tracking will force the failover if EITHER the upstream OR downstream switch fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:31:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-03T00:31:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Availability</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12860#M9425</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Palo Alto instructions to set up High Availability are fairly straightforward, but the devices upstream and downstream barely get a mention. In our case, downstream we have two Cisco switches and multiple VMs attached. Upstream are two Cisco switches to a larger network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are considering link-state tracking on the Cisco switches to create the redundancy for the Palo Alto's to failover. Any suggestions or tips?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12860#M9425</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmck9999</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-01T14:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12861#M9426</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/u1/2254"&gt;jmck9999&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following document illustrates Palo Alto's recommended best practices for HA failover scenarios for link and path monitoring:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-5008"&gt;High Availability Failover Optimization&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kunal Adak&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12861#M9426</guid>
      <dc:creator>kadak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-01T14:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12862#M9427</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Jmck9999,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can find supporting documents on bellow link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="/search.jspa?q=Link Monitoring&amp;amp;type=document" title="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/search.jspa?q=Link+Monitoring&amp;amp;type=document"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/search.jspa?q=Link+Monitoring&amp;amp;type=document&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardik Shah&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 23:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12862#M9427</guid>
      <dc:creator>hshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T23:26:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12863#M9428</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have dual switches on both sides you are in a good position for reliability in hardware failure modes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You do need to be sure that your PA tracking will force the failover if EITHER the upstream OR downstream switch fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:31:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/12863#M9428</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T00:31:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/393233#M90992</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Support,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can we deploy Palo Alto Firewall in existing Cloud Network with HA mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability/m-p/393233#M90992</guid>
      <dc:creator>dineshgogna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-24T10:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

