<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN Site-2-Site both sides with dynamic IP in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-site-2-site-both-sides-with-dynamic-ip/m-p/424883#M94302</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In theory, as long as the one site has a Dynamic DNS setup to get to it, then it should work that way.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if the source did not, then it wouldn't be possible to establish the tunnel the other way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:02:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-08-05T17:02:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN Site-2-Site both sides with dynamic IP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-site-2-site-both-sides-with-dynamic-ip/m-p/424634#M94271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;VPN Site-2-Site both sides with dynamic IP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon, first of all, thank you very much for your support and help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Site 1:&lt;/EM&gt; Palo Alto with Dynamic output to the Internet.( already have NAT configured on the modem/router/ADSL pointing to the Private WAN IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Site 2&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Palo Alto with Dynamic output to the Internet (already have NAT configured on the modem/router/ADSL pointing to the Private WAN IP).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Site 2&lt;/STRONG&gt; has DynDNS service configured, so it has a FQDN ( vpnsite2site.dyndns.net ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it feasible to be able to set up a site to site tunnel between these two high stick/sites with dynamic ip and on one end a dyndns FQDN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Connection scheme:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site1: Palo Alto Wan 192.168.1.100 ---GW 192.168.1.254 ----Router/ADSL/Modem/NAT:1:1------IPSEC-VPN-----Internet-----IPSEC-VPN-----FQDN ( vpnsite2site. dyndns.net) Router/ADSL/Modem/NAT:1:1Site2:GW192.168.2.254 ---R-----IPWAN--192.168.2.100---GW192.168.2.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you very much, I remain attentive, thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-site-2-site-both-sides-with-dynamic-ip/m-p/424634#M94271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Metgatz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-05T03:12:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Site-2-Site both sides with dynamic IP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-site-2-site-both-sides-with-dynamic-ip/m-p/424883#M94302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In theory, as long as the one site has a Dynamic DNS setup to get to it, then it should work that way.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if the source did not, then it wouldn't be possible to establish the tunnel the other way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 17:02:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vpn-site-2-site-both-sides-with-dynamic-ip/m-p/424883#M94302</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdelio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-05T17:02:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

