<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245933#M97231</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently I wanted to test the EDL matching, so I just used application any.&amp;nbsp;Is there a specific protocol/app that is not matching that range?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lmori</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-14T17:07:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245606#M97224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For the last couple of weeks we are running into an interesting issue with our Office365 EDL's.&amp;nbsp; We pull the Office365 API based IP/URL list into Panorama using MineMeld.&amp;nbsp; This process is working perfectly.&amp;nbsp; We have compared the output within MineMeld against the EDL on our firewall and they are identical.&amp;nbsp; For some reason I am seeing multiple connections being blocked to IPv4 ranges that are contained in the EDL.&amp;nbsp; This is occurring on multiple protocols, STUN, SSL, etc... affecting Skype For Business for a number of users.&amp;nbsp; Now, what is odd, is that I can fix this issue if I take the IP range from the EDL present on the firewall and create a network object for it and place it in the same exact rule.&amp;nbsp; So this tells me that the problem is with the firewall using objects in this specific EDL.&amp;nbsp; The EDL has 184 different IPs or IP ranges in it.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We are running 8.1.4 on all firewalls.&amp;nbsp; Has anyone else run into this issue?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:07:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245606#M97224</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewZener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-10T21:07:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245660#M97226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40281"&gt;@AndrewZener&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thank you for posting this. Could you share the range?&amp;nbsp;I did a quick a test but I could not reproduce the issue&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Luigi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245660#M97226</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-11T08:41:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245907#M97227</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40281"&gt;@AndrewZener&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tested this again with your version, 8.1.4, and I wasn't able to find the range that wasn't matched via EDL. Everything looks good. Could you share more details?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245907#M97227</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T14:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245916#M97228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the IP range:&amp;nbsp; 52.112.0.0-52.115.255.255&amp;nbsp; The app affected is Skype.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Like I mentioned earlier I can clearly see the IP range on the firewall contained within the EDL but the traffic is still getting denied by policy to this specific range.&amp;nbsp; Once I add an IP range Object&amp;nbsp;for it to the same rule it starts matching and the traffic is allowed.&amp;nbsp; I haven't checked to see if there are other ranges in the EDL&amp;nbsp;being denied, so I will check that this morning and report back.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245916#M97228</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewZener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T14:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245928#M97229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! Just checked again and it is matching. Which NGFW device are you using? I am testing this on a VM, wondering if it could be an issue with hw architectures with a dedicated dataplane.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245928#M97229</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T16:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245931#M97230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a VM-300.&amp;nbsp; I did notice this morning that we are missing some of the Office365/Skype AppID dependencies but I don't see any of them being used.&amp;nbsp; Can you tell me which AppID's you are testing with?&amp;nbsp; I am going to try and narrow it down to a specific AppID or protocol.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245931#M97230</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewZener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T17:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with the MineMeld Microsoft EDL's</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245933#M97231</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently I wanted to test the EDL matching, so I just used application any.&amp;nbsp;Is there a specific protocol/app that is not matching that range?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/issues-with-the-minemeld-microsoft-edl-s/m-p/245933#M97231</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T17:07:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

