<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Reliable Threat Feed with lowest false positive for Production Environment in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reliable-threat-feed-with-lowest-false-positive-for-production/m-p/126493#M98545</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am wondering, which threat feed is most reliable with lowest false positive that can be used in production environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have done analysis on it? &amp;nbsp;Which one is most commonly threat feed used by customer in production environment? Does anyone using confidence level for any feeds?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hsoni</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-15T18:38:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Reliable Threat Feed with lowest false positive for Production Environment</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reliable-threat-feed-with-lowest-false-positive-for-production/m-p/126493#M98545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am wondering, which threat feed is most reliable with lowest false positive that can be used in production environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have done analysis on it? &amp;nbsp;Which one is most commonly threat feed used by customer in production environment? Does anyone using confidence level for any feeds?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reliable-threat-feed-with-lowest-false-positive-for-production/m-p/126493#M98545</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsoni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-15T18:38:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reliable Threat Feed with lowest false positive for Production Environment</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reliable-threat-feed-with-lowest-false-positive-for-production/m-p/126652#M98546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17129"&gt;@hsoni﻿&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;it really depends on which type of threats and indicators are you interested in. Some rules of thumb:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- URLs and domains are less prone to false positives than IP addresses&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- feeds refreshing their contents many times per day are less prone to false positives&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- often commercial feeds provide a confidence level per indicators, this really helps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which types of indicators and which type of threats&amp;nbsp;are&amp;nbsp;you interested in ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:29:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reliable-threat-feed-with-lowest-false-positive-for-production/m-p/126652#M98546</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmori</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-16T07:29:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

