<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Layer 2 tunnel on a Palo alto in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/439068#M99504</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot create L2VPN on the Palo Alto. The document referenced by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/102597"&gt;@asangra&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;shows a PA in L2 mode, but the IPSec tunnel created is between a router and L3 mode PA. The encapsulated tunnel is Layer 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you wanted to create a L2VPN you would need to do it between two routers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding which is better, it is dependent on the traffic type. Some network services operate at Layer2 only and cannot be routed, so an L2VPN between sites is the only viable option. From a security perspective as you have seen, the PA can operate in either mode to provide security.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:00:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SebRupik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-06T11:00:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Layer 2 tunnel on a Palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/438870#M99482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you create a layer 2 tunnel on a palo alto 3050? Is a layer 3 tunnel better than a layer 2 tunnel? Is a layer 2 tunnel more of a private or direction connection than a layer 3?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 15:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/438870#M99482</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-05T15:52:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layer 2 tunnel on a Palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/438877#M99483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we can using SVI technology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClMuCAK" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClMuCAK&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 15:57:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/438877#M99483</guid>
      <dc:creator>asangra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-05T15:57:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layer 2 tunnel on a Palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/438880#M99484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/102597"&gt;@asangra&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will read the article but right off the top of your head is layer 2 tunnel a more direct connection than layer 3&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 15:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/438880#M99484</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-05T15:59:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layer 2 tunnel on a Palo alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/439068#M99504</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot create L2VPN on the Palo Alto. The document referenced by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/102597"&gt;@asangra&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;shows a PA in L2 mode, but the IPSec tunnel created is between a router and L3 mode PA. The encapsulated tunnel is Layer 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you wanted to create a L2VPN you would need to do it between two routers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding which is better, it is dependent on the traffic type. Some network services operate at Layer2 only and cannot be routed, so an L2VPN between sites is the only viable option. From a security perspective as you have seen, the PA can operate in either mode to provide security.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 11:00:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-2-tunnel-on-a-palo-alto/m-p/439068#M99504</guid>
      <dc:creator>SebRupik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-06T11:00:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

