I'm running BGP and OSPF on same virtual router and whenever I commit a change, I get the following warning:
In virtual-router VR_1, BGP router-id 184.108.40.206 is different from OSPF router-id 10.1.1.1.
Since I'm getting warned about it, I'm thinking it probably is preferred for BGP and OSPF to have same router-id on a given virtual router. It's not causing any issues but I'm really curious about why it keeps warning me about it. anyone has an idea?
Solved! Go to Solution.
There is no functional requirement for the RID to be the same (hence why this is a warning instead of a commit failure). It's easy to see how this could lead to a confusing situation for administrators, however, which is presumably why the PAN-OS devs decided to display a warning.
Thanks for your reply! I figured it wasn't required by Palo Alto since it's only a warning as you said. I just didn't know why it warns about it. I thought that the warning is leading me toworad following some best practice or something.
thanks for your answer again!
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the Live Community as a whole!
The Live Community thanks you for your participation!