How will threat functionality work with asymmetric routing

L2 Linker

How will threat functionality work with asymmetric routing

Posted this on threat discussions but havent had any responses. Please help me understand what will happen in this case.

 

I would like to understand what will happen to Threat Protection and AntiVirus(TPAV) in the following case.  Both firewalls have "allow" non-syn-tcp turned on. Each firewall is only seeing half of the session and has no idea about the other half. 

 

My questions is will Palo be able to detect any threats or vulnerabilities, (or) does it need to see a bi-directional flow/session to kick in TPAV parameters.

 

Please let me know for any questions in case I am not clear. 

 

question.PNG

L7 Applicator

Re: How will threat functionality work with asymmetric routing

If you need asymmetric routing then set up active/active HA.

In this case packets of same session will be forwarded to firewall that is owner of this specific session so it can check all of them and provide better protection against threats.

 

Enterprise Architect @ Cloud Carib www.cloudcarib.com
ACE (3.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0), PCNSE (6, 7), PCNSI
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the Live Community as a whole!

The Live Community thanks you for your participation!