I have added three tunnel interfaces (tunnel.101, tunnel.102, tunnel.103) and assigned them to a virtual router. Now I want to add static routes pointing to the tunnel interfaces as next hop.
I have discovered that all tunnel interfaces are listed as "tunnel" - and not "tunnel.101", "tunnel.102", "tunnel.103".
I believe that this is a bug?
Solved! Go to Solution.
In fact it looks as if all sub-interfaces are listed incorrectly. I have several sub-interfaces on ethernet1/11.
Version 3.0.1 Last Revision: May 21 2015 00
looks like a bug to me
but this is also already a very old PanOS version
please upgrade to at least 5.x or higher
I am migrating from a firewall that is not zone aware and using rule based VPN - and a lot of VPN related rules. By defining tunnel interfaces and routes in the migration tool I could have auto-assigned zones to the VPN rules.
However, because of this bug I now do the assignment of zones manually.
As a workaround maybe you can export your config from the MT3 to your firewall, make the changes there and export it and re-load into the MT3 and then run the auto-zone?
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the Live Community as a whole!
The Live Community thanks you for your participation!