I have each of my processors set up to send to two different output miners - one for the firewalls to ingest (stdlib.feedHCGreen) and one for my SIEM to ingest (stdlib.taxiiDataFeed). I'm seeing differences between what is ending up in my SIEM and what is on the list for the firewalls. I believe feedHCGreen outputs are correct while TAXII outputs are off.
Looking at the NODES screen, the number of indicators is different between the output miners. This is consistent with 6 different processors (total of 12 miners, 6 of feedHCGreen and 6 of taxiiDataFeed). Screenshots are below showing differences in counts of indicators.
It is quite possible that I am not understanding how TAXII works or I am doing something wrong. Is it part of the protocol that indicators automatically age out after a period of time? I didn't see anything in the prototype configs that specify an age out time. The result I am trying to accomplish is both sets of outputs having the exact same data at all times.
Solved! Go to Solution.
yes, there is a difference between "traditional" feeds and TAXII DataFeeds:
There is a second type TAXII Data Collection called Data Set that is more similar to a traditional static feed. This is not supported yet, but we plan to add support in the short term.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the Live Community as a whole!
The Live Community thanks you for your participation!