Enhanced Security Measures in Place:   To ensure a safer experience, we’ve implemented additional, temporary security measures for all users.

kubernetes plugin - monitoring definition, bug?

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

kubernetes plugin - monitoring definition, bug?

L0 Member

Took me long, but now i think i found strange behavior of the Kubernetes plugin - monitoring definition and especially matching criteria in the dynamic address groups.

TL/DR - having service in the kubernetes cluster, which does not have assigned ports - breaks the polling and watcher

 

Starting point was : working cn series as well the possibility to use the data from monitoring definition - both: to create dynamic groups and to use them in policy. Suddenly after while the monitoring definition processes (polling and watcher) stopped function (stuck in initializing state). Long story short - discovered in the kubernetes plugin logs the following suspicious lines

2024-05-23 13:21:39.868 +0300 ERROR: k8s-ret: skipping service, no port information found 'NoneType' object is not iterable
2024-05-23 13:21:39.869 +0300 ERROR: k8s-ret: skipping service, no port information found 'NoneType' object is not iterable

 

Looking at my kubernetes cluster - there were two distinct from the other services - without ports (PORT(S) column)

NAMESPACE         NAME                          TYPE        CLUSTER-IP      EXTERNAL-IP   PORT(S)                  AGE
longhorn-system   longhorn-engine-manager       ClusterIP   None            <none>        <none>                   87d
longhorn-system   longhorn-replica-manager      ClusterIP   None            <none>        <none>                   87d

 

Next - i just add some ports definition to them - as i want to see if that will make any difference to the panorama monitoring definition processes. And it does - the processes started in normal state (connected)

2024-05-23 13:24:20.327 +0300 DEBUG: k8s-ret: <labkube> Successfully retrieved Service information.

 

Still not sure for the root cause of this behavior, probably can be bug. As having services without ports seems just ok for me.
Hope that, this behavior is reproducible elsewhere and will be addressed?

1 REPLY 1

Community Team Member

Hi @YLesev ,

 

Thanks for sharing your findings. I would recommend reaching out to support to share what you have. 

LIVEcommunity team member
Stay Secure,
Jay
Don't forget to Like items if a post is helpful to you!

Please help out other users and “Accept as Solution” if a post helps solve your problem !

Read more about how and why to accept solutions.
  • 984 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!