5200 upgrade from 8.1.5 to 9.0.6 and HA2 won't come up

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

5200 upgrade from 8.1.5 to 9.0.6 and HA2 won't come up

L4 Transporter

Perform an upgrade from 8.1.5 directly to 9.0.6 yesterday on A/P pair of 5250.  The HA2 link won't come up on 9.0.6

 

This is from TAC,

 

Check the pan_dha.log in dp0-log and dp1-log for this error,

 

I was able to see the following errors that explain as to why HA2 would not come up:

pan_dha.log
++++++++++++++
Error:  pan_dha_config_connection_load(pan_dha_config.c:483): invalid peer ha2-ip addres
++++++++++++++

What might have happened, is that after the reboot once 9.0.6 was installed, the full configuration might not have been validated, including the HA2 config,  for one internal reason or another. Physically, the interface port was healthy throughout the upgrade process, but it looks like it was an internal configuration issue. I myself have experienced issues that a commit after upgrading would fix issues that arose after the upgrade reboot.

Hope this helps others.

 

E

4 REPLIES 4

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

Hello,

Check the config on both PAN's and make sure they are correct. If still not working, try changing the HA2 config so you know its not correct, commit the changes and then change them back.

 

Just some thoughts.

Hello @OtakarKlier ,

 

The issue is not related to HA2 config of the firewall, as TAC explained, something went wrong in auto commit. 

 

Suggestion 1 , commit force.

Suggestion 2, reboot the firewall.

 

I rolled back both firewall to 8.1.5 and upgraded to 8.1.13, then to 9.0.0, and then upgraded to 9.0.6.  HA2 link stay up.   Just want to share my experience to save others time and pain to do many many upgrades.

 

E

@nextgenhappines,

So you went from a non-recommended upgrade path to mirroring the recommended upgrade path and your issues went away, funny how that works out 😉 ; - )

 

In all seriousness, this is exactly why I stress following the actual recommended upgrade path as much as I do. 95% of the time it won't matter and everything will work perfectly fine, but then 5% of the time something breaks and can cause an outage. It's better that you follow the proper process and need a bit more time for the maintenance window than have an issue and cause an unexpected outage or unexpected extended maintenance. 

 

@BPry 

 

Change window is difficult to request.  Don't want to fill out additional paper works to explain what happened.    "Recommended" upgrade. takes 3 times long.   It takes 35 minutes for a firewall to reboot (I do miss the good old days work on screenos) and I have to do 6 upgrades instead of 2..  hmm.. that is a hard sales for me.  

 

If I knew the TAC tricks,  1) try commit force, or 2) reboot the firewall on the version that you wanted.  That would have save so much time as well.   Just want to share my experience and hope to save others; time and stress.

 

 

 

 

  • 3170 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!