We are also facing the same issue and we have a setup of Juniper & Palo alto. Juniper side it is LACP active with fast & palo is passive with fast. Does anyone else have the similar issue?
Well, that is because it worked that way, the recommendation also says that you must have atleast one side as active & it should be ok. although if I think more deeply keeping active/active both side will make both the devices to send PDU's so an increased traffic or so.
Would u mind sharing the software version of both sides, I have 14.1x.53 on Juniper & 17.1.18 on PA side.
First, I would migrate off of Junos version 14.x for anything unless it is JTAC recommended. There are only a couple pieces of hardware that still use this as recommended. All of my hardware is v15.x minimum with most v17.x or higher. PAN 7.1.x is going EOL next year. I would move to 8.1.x ASAP. It appears you are running code versions that are becoming fairly dated. I would not worry about "increased traffic" of LACP active. You aren't running 10/100mbit links. Even then, it probably wouldn't be an issue.
Yeah, I agree with that, let me do it active/active & will update you, it might be a possibility with version 14.1x53 I'm running on the switch.
Thanks for all your help & thoughts.
I also noticed the same problem between Pan 5250 running 8.1.13 and Juniper QFX10002 running JunOS 18.4R2.7
Both Active, Fast. but 1 interface is keep going out of AE group almost 2 to 5 times an hour.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!