Has anybody encountered a situation where a rule was configured for one application but matched other applications?

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Has anybody encountered a situation where a rule was configured for one application but matched other applications?

L1 Bithead

I have the following rule

rule.png

I used 'any' as the service because we have web servers running on multiple ports and not just on the default.

While it does match ssl and web-browsing traffic as expected,  it also matches unexpected application traffic like the following

traffic.png

I don't understand why it would match oracle traffic.  Any ideas?

15 REPLIES 15

L1 Bithead

Yup that doesn't make any sense. I suggest you open a case if you haven't. As a test, you can put a deny all rule at the bottom  and see if oracle is still being allowed but make sure you've allowed EVERYTHING that you need because you'll see a lot of blocked traffic which will cause issues with your users. Probably do that after hours. Hope that helps.

  • 7129 Views
  • 15 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!