License/Eula for GlobalProtect Portal client v3.x

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Please sign in to see details of an important advisory in our Customer Advisories area.

License/Eula for GlobalProtect Portal client v3.x

L0 Member

We have a client that requires GlobalProtect for connecting to their network. Their site provides the installers which is version 3.1.1.27. We have an internal team that insists on receiving a license description or EULA for using the client binaries. They cannot believe that there is such a thing as a software client that doesnt show or store a EULA for the user to agree. I dont have access to the server software although I have already logged a request for the GlobalProtect system administrators to confirm that using the Portal client does not require a licence.

 

The closest I can see are the following:

 

Are there any literature that officially discuses the license restrictions (or lack of) on the  Portal client? Thanks.

 

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

@ramfree17,

The agent really isn't anything that Palo Alto is worried about, and I don't believe there actually is any license to give for it. Essentially Palo Alto doesn't care about the agent, they care about the device you are connecting to and it's license compliance. 

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3

L5 Sessionator

Hi,

 

With the link you provide, you have all info no ??

 

Rgds

 

V.

Cyber Elite
Cyber Elite

@ramfree17,

The agent really isn't anything that Palo Alto is worried about, and I don't believe there actually is any license to give for it. Essentially Palo Alto doesn't care about the agent, they care about the device you are connecting to and it's license compliance. 

@VinceM: Not really. None of them talks about the client. The reviewers are not accepting the argumetn that the lack of reference is evidence of the lack of licensing terms. I wish it does since I spent more time trying to prove it doesnt exist than just creating a dummy BSD-type EULA. They wont know the difference anyway. 😞

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 3735 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!