PA-1420 QinQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Content translations are temporarily unavailable due to site maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience. Visit our blog to learn more.

PA-1420 QinQ

L0 Member

Does the PA-1420 support QinQ tagging terminating at the Firewall? We have a L2 connection with an ISP to Azure and they require QinQ tagging. We do not have an ISR or other router to do it for us at this time.

 

Thanks,

Steve 

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

Community Team Member

Hi @smzr34 ,

 

The firewall cannot fully terminate or decapsulate both VLAN tags in a QinQ setup. This means it cannot strip the outer tag and forward traffic based on the inner tag. However, it can match and process traffic based on the outer VLAN tag if you configure your fw in vwire. A palo in vwire will forward QinQ traffic to pass through while preserving the inner tag.

 

There is a feature request for QinQ support right now, but it has been open for many years. I’d recommend reaching out to your SE. They can document your requirements and help you register a vote for the feature. That said, the general industry practice is to leverage high-end routers or switches for advanced Layer 2 functions like QinQ, which might explain why this hasn’t been a primary focus for firewalls.

 

Hope this helps! 

LIVEcommunity team member
Stay Secure,
Jay
Don't forget to Like items if a post is helpful to you!

Please help out other users and “Accept as Solution” if a post helps solve your problem !

Read more about how and why to accept solutions.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1

Community Team Member

Hi @smzr34 ,

 

The firewall cannot fully terminate or decapsulate both VLAN tags in a QinQ setup. This means it cannot strip the outer tag and forward traffic based on the inner tag. However, it can match and process traffic based on the outer VLAN tag if you configure your fw in vwire. A palo in vwire will forward QinQ traffic to pass through while preserving the inner tag.

 

There is a feature request for QinQ support right now, but it has been open for many years. I’d recommend reaching out to your SE. They can document your requirements and help you register a vote for the feature. That said, the general industry practice is to leverage high-end routers or switches for advanced Layer 2 functions like QinQ, which might explain why this hasn’t been a primary focus for firewalls.

 

Hope this helps! 

LIVEcommunity team member
Stay Secure,
Jay
Don't forget to Like items if a post is helpful to you!

Please help out other users and “Accept as Solution” if a post helps solve your problem !

Read more about how and why to accept solutions.
  • 1 accepted solution
  • 190 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!