linux /etc/iproute2/rt_tables filled with 231 pangp.include and 232 pangp.exclude

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

linux /etc/iproute2/rt_tables filled with 231 pangp.include and 232 pangp.exclude

L1 Bithead

system:

* fedora 43 x86-64 fully patched

* GP client 6.3.3


the linux file for giving routing tables a name is getting stuffed with the same things over and over. there were over 2100 duplicate entries!!

# head /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude

# sort < !$ | uniq -d -c
sort < /etc/iproute2/rt_tables | uniq -d -c
1063 231 pangp.include
1063 232 pangp.exclude


this is the GP package I have installed

# rpm -qi GlobalProtect_UI_rpm-6.3.3-619.x86_64
Name        : GlobalProtect_UI_rpm
Version     : 6.3.3
Release     : 619
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Mon 13 Oct 2025 10:22:57 BST
Group       : Applications/System
Size        : 40917917
License     : GPL
Signature   : (none)
Source RPM  : GlobalProtect_UI_rpm-6.3.3-619.src.rpm
Build Date  : Wed 01 Oct 2025 17:42:16 BST
Build Host  : f0d9790b99e9
URL         : www.paloaltonetworks.com
Summary     : Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect VPN Client
Description :
Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect VPN Client


overall the client is pretty crappy, some of the settings menus are invisible because the color scheme is white on white or black on black. Dismal effort, shows very poor testing by PaloAlto.

1 accepted solution

Accepted Solutions

Community Team Member

Hey @pmansfield ,

 

Thanks for taking the time to gather all of that! Those entries should only exist once, so the client continuously re-adding them points to unexpected behavior. I don't see any known issues related to this on my end. 

I’d recommend opening a support ticket so this can be properly documented and looked at by engineering. If you include the OS version (Fedora 43), the GP client version (6.3.3-619), and the output showing the duplicates, that should give Support a good starting point.

 

Appreciate you calling this out! once it’s in a case, it’s much easier for us to track and improve upon. 

LIVEcommunity team member
Stay Secure,
Jay
Don't forget to Like items if a post is helpful to you!

Please help out other users and “Accept as Solution” if a post helps solve your problem !

Read more about how and why to accept solutions.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

Community Team Member

Hey @pmansfield ,

 

Thanks for taking the time to gather all of that! Those entries should only exist once, so the client continuously re-adding them points to unexpected behavior. I don't see any known issues related to this on my end. 

I’d recommend opening a support ticket so this can be properly documented and looked at by engineering. If you include the OS version (Fedora 43), the GP client version (6.3.3-619), and the output showing the duplicates, that should give Support a good starting point.

 

Appreciate you calling this out! once it’s in a case, it’s much easier for us to track and improve upon. 

LIVEcommunity team member
Stay Secure,
Jay
Don't forget to Like items if a post is helpful to you!

Please help out other users and “Accept as Solution” if a post helps solve your problem !

Read more about how and why to accept solutions.

L1 Bithead

the forum lost my reply, writing it again...

I do not have access to the support service as I am an end user, and do not think my company's infosec people care about us minority linux users, I had a hard enough time even getting the client rpm in the first place.

I cleared out the excess entries a few days ago and it continued to grow. 

$ more /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
# the pangp entries will grow out of control as the daemon keeps adding them
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude

666 splitter

231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude
231 pangp.include
232 pangp.exclude

 

  • 1 accepted solution
  • 129 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 Likes
Like what you see?

Show your appreciation!

Click Like if a post is helpful to you or if you just want to show your support.

Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.

The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!

These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!

The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!