So As a network admin I was disappointed to see that Palo have marked this url as low risk : https://webrecorder.io/
If you do not block this site it allows your users to negate all of your well thought out url policies, yes they can just jump on a porn site and start streaming away.
I submitted the url to test a site a few days ago but still the url is marked as low risk - network admins - give it a go your be worryingly surprised by just how badly it rips a way around your filtering.
I know i'm one little user but it has huge issues for passing through all those rules that have been carefully considered.
for reference I have requested it be marked as "proxy evasion" seems a reasonable fit but if not I hope palo can better fit it to another section.
Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided.
The button appears next to the replies on topics you’ve started. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it!
These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the LIVEcommunity as a whole!
The LIVEcommunity thanks you for your participation!