This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About wmclendon
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About wmclendon
05-14-2023
1Post
0Likes
0Solutions
May 14, 2023Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by wmclendon
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 14808 | 02-10-2011 07:48 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 02-06-2011 10:18 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 05-14-2023 02:24 AM |
| Posts | 1 |
02-10-2011
07:48 AM
greetings all, I come from a ScreenOS background, and in their world, you can terminate multiple route-based VPNs onto a single logical tunnel interface. We have 30-40 remote sites with VPN tunnels back to HQ, which will soon be a new PAN firewall. In our lab I have tried to configure multiple IPSec VPNs terminating onto the same tunnel interface and I get the following error: Tunnel interface tunnel.1 multiple binding with different IKE gateways. This leads me to believe I will have to create a tunnel interface per each remote site -- is this the case? or is there a configuration setting I am missing that will allow this configuration? If it is the case, i'm a little worried about having to run a routing protocol on each and every one of those interfaces (we need to dynamically learn routes from the remote sites in our scenario) Thanks, Will
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Configuration
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-14-2023
02:24 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks