This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About User_333
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About User_333
23Posts
0Likes
1Solution
Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by User_333
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2759 | 03-09-2018 02:57 PM | |
| 2767 | 03-09-2018 01:45 PM | |
| 1824 | 06-16-2017 04:12 AM | |
| 1095 | 11-07-2013 01:19 AM | |
| 2454 | 07-06-2012 02:46 PM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Likes | |||
| 1 Like | |||
| 2 Likes |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 02-10-2011 02:59 AM |
| Date Last Visited | |
| Posts | 23 |
03-09-2018
02:57 PM
In vWire, packets will (according to documentation) always leave the same box which received the packet. If the other box is responsible for L7 processing the packet will be sent trough HA3 to the other box for L7 processing. After this, it is either blocked or sent back to the first box trough HA3 which will send it out the other side of the vWire. In no case (bugs excluded), a "vWire"-packet will leave the data interface on the other box. With this, it is guaranteed Paloalto wont generate a loop since it behaves like a cable. Sorry, currently no clue why this could be happened.
... View more
03-09-2018
01:45 PM
ASA did no failover/split-brain during this change?
... View more
06-16-2017
04:12 AM
Moving an Object (at least Address, Service, Region Objects) from a device Group to "Shared" is possible trough the GUI the follow way: - Navigate to Objects -> Address - Choose Device Group which contains Object - Select the Address (could also be more than one at the time) - Click on "move" at the bottom (next to add/del) - Popup will be there to choose the new Device Group or "shared" I never tested to move from "shared" to a device group, but i think it should work. Important: You will get an error if you move e.g. a device group to shared if not all objects within this device group are already shared. Works with Panorama 7.1
... View more
11-07-2013
01:19 AM
Hello I made a CSR. Got my Cert and did the stuff mentioned in the "how to chained certificate", Copied the intermediate on top of my cert. but the PA-500 did not accept it. okey i tried it without the intermediate cert text - and it worked. Request is gone and now there is a valid cert. but now when i try to open the captivePortal Response page i get a Cert error. logicaly because of the missing intermediate part. is there a way to put the intermediate to the allready valid cert? or do i have to make a new request?
... View more
07-06-2012
02:46 PM
If your side gets this "timeouts" log entries it would be interesting to see what the logs on the other side are (if its possible to get them).
... View more
Contact Me
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks