This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About wwhitaker
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About wwhitaker
09-26-2023
1Post
0Likes
0Solutions
Sep 26, 2023Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by wwhitaker
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 57529 | 10-15-2020 09:35 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 02-01-2019 08:40 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 09-26-2023 11:56 AM |
| Posts | 1 |
10-15-2020
09:35 AM
@steveomitchell I know you posted your comment a couple of months ago but just ran across it. You should be able to still do the "No direct access to local network" and do exclusions. The No direct access just adds a route in the client route table for the local subnet and points it to the tunnel with a lower metric. The exclusions also add a route in the table but points it to the local interface. We are using both so you should be fine.
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
09-26-2023
11:56 AM
|
Latest Tags
No tags yet
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks