This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About tejasmapuskar
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About tejasmapuskar
05-15-2023
10Posts
0Likes
1Solution
May 15, 2023Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by tejasmapuskar
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 692 | 03-13-2023 08:25 AM | |
| 782 | 03-10-2023 07:04 AM | |
| 1819 | 11-20-2020 07:17 AM | |
| 1873 | 11-19-2020 08:57 PM | |
| 3395 | 05-20-2020 08:44 PM | |
| 3239 | 04-12-2020 07:02 PM | |
| 3361 | 04-10-2020 02:22 PM | |
| 3512 | 04-10-2020 12:53 PM | |
| 3603 | 04-09-2020 02:35 PM | |
| 3719 | 04-09-2020 02:27 PM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 05-13-2019 07:15 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 05-15-2023 09:26 AM |
| Posts | 10 |
03-13-2023
08:25 AM
Hi,
Thanks for looking into it. The issue was fixed after renewing the expired Digicert issue on the firewall.
... View more
03-10-2023
07:04 AM
We have a decryption rule to allow user internet access over SSL. Access to LinkedIn was working until 2 days back we started getting certificate error with validity expired. All users accessing the internet use the same CA signed certificate with no issues. I have attached the logs showing access permitted but the session end reason is policy-deny.
... View more
11-20-2020
07:17 AM
Hi, I am going to give it a try. Which ports does panorama need to communicate with the firewalls apart from TCP- 3978 and TCP 28443 ?
... View more
11-19-2020
08:57 PM
We have virtual Palo firewalls in AWS VPC behind the AWS internet gateway. We are looking to register them to the on-prem panorama.
... View more
05-20-2020
08:44 PM
We are seeing alternate denies on the firewall with reason- decrypt-unsupport-param and tcp-rst-from-server when a user tries to connect over SSL to a URL. The detailed log view shows type-vulnerability action-alert but traffic is denied by implicit interzone rule. Logs do not show decryption although SSL forward proxy is enabled. Please help me understand this behavior of firewall and meaning of decrypt-unsupport-param.
... View more
04-10-2020
02:22 PM
The test security policy rule do not show the rule thats seen under the firewall logs. What does that mean? is this a cosmetic error.
... View more
04-10-2020
12:53 PM
Please see the attached files. This is a similar instance where the source zone is not defined in the rule still firewall is using the rule to allow the communication.
... View more
04-09-2020
02:35 PM
As i mentioned earlier, the destination is not in the rule still PA is allowing traffic using that rule.
... View more
04-09-2020
02:27 PM
Under traffic logs we are seeing communication is being allowed through an access rule which does not have a match for destination server. There is security profile attached to the rule. Can someone please explain this behavior of PA.
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-15-2023
09:26 AM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks