This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Get Started
- News & Events
- Collaboration
- Education Services
- Technologies
- Next-Generation Firewall
- GlobalProtect
- Threat Prevention Services
- Endpoint Protection
- SSL Decryption
- App-ID
- Content-ID
- User-ID
- 5G
- IoT Security
- Cloud Identity Engine
- Panorama
- AIOps for NGFW
Network Security
- Prisma Access
- Prisma Cloud
- Prisma SD-WAN
- Cloud NGFW for AWS
- CN-Series
- VM-Series:
- Private Cloud
- OCI
- Alibaba
- AWS
- GCP
- Azure
Cloud Security
- Cortex XDR
- Cortex XSOAR
- Cortex Data Lake
- Cortex Xpanse
Security Operations
- Resources
About tejasmapuskar
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- LIVEcommunity
- About tejasmapuskar
04-19-2022
8Posts
0Likes
0Solutions
Apr 19, 2022Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by tejasmapuskar
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 962 | 11-20-2020 07:17 AM | |
| 1016 | 11-19-2020 08:57 PM | |
| 2347 | 05-20-2020 08:44 PM | |
| 2302 | 04-12-2020 07:02 PM | |
| 2424 | 04-10-2020 02:22 PM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 05-13-2019 07:15 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 04-19-2022 09:56 AM |
| Posts | 8 |
11-20-2020
07:17 AM
Hi, I am going to give it a try. Which ports does panorama need to communicate with the firewalls apart from TCP- 3978 and TCP 28443 ?
... View more
11-19-2020
08:57 PM
We have virtual Palo firewalls in AWS VPC behind the AWS internet gateway. We are looking to register them to the on-prem panorama.
... View more
05-20-2020
08:44 PM
We are seeing alternate denies on the firewall with reason- decrypt-unsupport-param and tcp-rst-from-server when a user tries to connect over SSL to a URL. The detailed log view shows type-vulnerability action-alert but traffic is denied by implicit interzone rule. Logs do not show decryption although SSL forward proxy is enabled. Please help me understand this behavior of firewall and meaning of decrypt-unsupport-param.
... View more
04-10-2020
02:22 PM
The test security policy rule do not show the rule thats seen under the firewall logs. What does that mean? is this a cosmetic error.
... View more
04-10-2020
12:53 PM
Please see the attached files. This is a similar instance where the source zone is not defined in the rule still firewall is using the rule to allow the communication.
... View more
04-09-2020
02:35 PM
As i mentioned earlier, the destination is not in the rule still PA is allowing traffic using that rule.
... View more
04-09-2020
02:27 PM
Under traffic logs we are seeing communication is being allowed through an access rule which does not have a match for destination server. There is security profile attached to the rule. Can someone please explain this behavior of PA.
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-19-2022
09:56 AM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2022 - Palo Alto Networks