This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About mike.pochan
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About mike.pochan
13Posts
1Like
0Solutions
Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by mike.pochan
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 954 | 11-21-2022 07:30 AM | |
| 900 | 11-01-2022 12:23 PM | |
| 2859 | 02-01-2021 07:21 PM | |
| 2940 | 02-01-2021 05:13 PM | |
| 2945 | 02-01-2021 05:11 PM | |
| 7850 | 12-01-2020 03:57 PM | |
| 1801 | 09-21-2020 02:17 PM | |
| 9608 | 09-17-2020 01:45 PM | |
| 9695 | 09-16-2020 09:46 AM | |
| 3099 | 06-12-2020 01:36 PM |
My Liked Posts
| Subject | Likes | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | 09-17-2020 01:45 PM |
Posts I Liked
| Subject | Likes | Author | Latest Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Like | |||
| 2 Likes |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 06-13-2019 05:10 PM |
| Date Last Visited | |
| Posts | 13 |
| Total Likes Received | 1 |
11-21-2022
07:30 AM
If we're using Prisma Access with a mix of external and internal gateways, do on-prem users authenticated to the internal gateways count against the Mobile User license? Or are only those connected to external gateways considered Mobile Users. I suspect they do not since they don't show up in the list of active Mobile Users but they also had to auth to the portal to connect to the internal gateway, so we weren't sure what actually constitutes a MU license.
... View more
11-01-2022
12:23 PM
What is the actual requirement? We are trying to redirect to a captive portal for an auth policy for https traffic and are being told by TAC this isn't supported unless we are decrypting all of the https traffic.
... View more
02-01-2021
07:21 PM
Good to know, thank you. We're having a similar experience with support presently.
... View more
02-01-2021
05:13 PM
depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, CN = *.8dmj55xsti.gw.gpcloudservice.com verify error:num=10:certificate has expired notAfter=Feb 2 00:03:06 2021 GMT verify return:1 depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, CN = *.8dmj55xsti.gw.gpcloudservice.com notAfter=Feb 2 00:03:06 2021 GMT verify return:1
... View more
02-01-2021
05:11 PM
Has anyone else noticed that the Prisma Access gateway certs expired today? A large majority of our users are unable to connect since GP sees the certs aren't valid. Trying to determine if this is isolated to us (which I doubt).
... View more
12-01-2020
03:57 PM
Has anyone heard from support or engineering on this? We've had a case open for a few weeks and their only suggestion was to upgrade the agent, which obviously didn't work.
... View more
09-21-2020
02:17 PM
Seeing resolution of external sites take up to 20 second to resolve on US-east. Anyone else seeing this?
... View more
09-16-2020
09:46 AM
Echoing @dparrish-better when is 1.7 being released? And to confirm the deadline for installation has been pushed from Sept 21 to October 1?
... View more
06-12-2020
01:36 PM
Was there ever a resolution for this? We are seeing the same thing, but just for Chromebook users from a single country. We've opened a case but wanted to see if there was something obvious that would resolve the issue.
... View more
03-17-2020
01:00 PM
All the Prisma Access North American gateways show as healthy on the status dashboard but from our perspective it is virtually unusable (especially US-WEST). Is there any way for us to determine what gateway's are under the most load? Right now we're essentially playing hot potato and telling users to switch to other ones as performance degrades
... View more
10-21-2019
10:49 AM
We're attempting to deploy a VM series in GCP to act as an outbound internet gateway. All documentation we've been able to find shows the Palos NATing the original source IP to another private IP in a 'public dmz' subnet. GCP will then NAT this new private IP to a public IP to traverse the internet. Has anyone had any success with a deployment where the Palos handle the single NAT of the original public IP to the new private IP? Seems like the private to private NATing the Palo does is unnecessary.
... View more
Contact Me
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks