About amansour

The drop down list is populated from the LDAP server configuration.  The User-ID Agent just builds the user to IP mapping.  As for the drop-down list showing names, it should auto-populate with usernames even if you haven't explicitly included groups.  However if you want to use Groups in policy you need to include them.  If the names aren't showing up it's either the browser or the LDAP connection but the drop-down list should show usernames without groups. ... View more

Yeah, pretty slick answer. ... View more

Hey All I have the Symantec DLP 11.6 deployed with PAN in a few places.  For the integration Symantec uses PCAP (SPAN or Mirror Ports to do network detection and the response is to markup the messages (ICAP and X-Forward for Web and Email) What we recommend is creating a FlexReponse (Symantec Specific) which makes an XML call can take a quick action on the user (so far this isn't fast enough to stop because we don't have a way to instantly send the user a block page or at least haven't found it).  @jmahoney I think we should put a thread together like the SIEM one with a point person assigned for each DLP platform. Just like ArcSight and RSA and others put their SIEM integration and docs on the forum there should be an integration for each documented here.  For Symantec Email Prevent there is no integration required, for Web Prevent this ICAP integration will likely need to be supplemented with a better FlexResponse. As for the others, without ICAP we'd need a way to call the XML quickly to do something, (Block URL is the most common). But without doing a commit. Anyway happy to work on this with you guys on it we are a CPSP and ASC and Go to Partner with Symantec DLP at least. ... View more

@mikand, they should have probably labelled it forward instead of proxy.  SSL and SSH also misleading but proxy in our DLP case means re-write.  It terminates the session and re-establishes it which can work for protocols like http, https, ftp but not all applications. Those proxy features forward traffic they don't re-write it.  I think It's also why the GlobalProtect portal is only somewhere you can download the agent and not put links or content that is re-written to the internal segments like other SSL-VPNs. Also Nice Pantopia score ... View more

Oh yeah and for anyone wondering.  PBF doesn't do it.  It send routes out an egress, ICAP is different than routing in the DLP world because the DLP can mark up ICAP like it cal SPAM X-FORWARD messages.  PBF Doesn't allow this so unless your DLP tool (Websense has a few articles on this) can do that then you're out of luck. ... View more

@jmahoney I think this will never make the roadmap.  ICAP and WCCP are forwarding for proxies (HTTP/HTTPS/FTP) that's the problem.  PAN does all protocols all the time, they can't proxy, there not a proxy, the developers likely cannot make this happen.  I think network based DLP better get more protocols to stay relevant on the wire which is why ICAP is no good. What I do is instead you should look at a re-generator TAP. Then tools which need to see all the traffic to do their job can have multiple copies (DLP is a great example, RSA Netwitness and other recorders like Niksun too). Then everyone gets a copy and is happy.   With respect to blocking (the ICAP forward) the DLP integration would likely have to create a flexible response (Symantec DLP does this) where you could send something to the XML API, like you could with a proxy filter (Websense) or MTA and SPAM filter.  Each response is going to be specific to the type of block and in the PAN case I think that's an XML-API call. Anyway my two cents.  Have the DLP bend the response because proxy is dead and they will be too if THEY don't adapt. ... View more

asdf ... View more

Is that a star trek reference. ... View more