This website uses cookies essential to its operation, for analytics, and for personalized content. By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies.
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
For details on cookie usage on our site, read our Privacy Policy
About Stephen24
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- LIVEcommunity
- About Stephen24
04-03-2020
18Posts
0Likes
1Solution
Apr 03, 2020Last Visited
User
Activity
User
Profile
Latest posts by Stephen24
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2687 | 04-01-2020 07:31 AM | |
| 2710 | 04-01-2020 06:32 AM | |
| 2736 | 04-01-2020 05:18 AM | |
| 2533 | 03-18-2020 08:23 AM | |
| 2587 | 03-17-2020 01:15 AM | |
| 2865 | 03-13-2020 08:20 AM | |
| 2936 | 03-12-2020 10:07 AM | |
| 2997 | 03-12-2020 10:01 AM | |
| 3349 | 10-30-2019 01:02 AM | |
| 3423 | 10-29-2019 10:00 AM |
User Badges
Community Statistics
| Member Since | 08-28-2019 08:12 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 04-03-2020 03:34 AM |
| Posts | 18 |
04-01-2020
07:31 AM
Hi @kiwi , I had already checked this KB in my set up, the Palo is able to send the aggregate to the peer even if it receives a prefix falling within the aggregated route range from the same peer
... View more
04-01-2020
06:32 AM
To clarify my request, I would like to know if in some cases the Palo can advertise an agregate even if it receives a prefix falling within this same aggregated route range
... View more
04-01-2020
05:18 AM
Hello, In our lab, we made a set up about peering BGP between Palo and a third part device. According to this kb from Palo : " The Palo Alto Networks firewall does not advertise an aggregated route to its peer when it receives a prefix falling within the aggregated route range from the same peer" but in our case it's working Does it mean the KB is wrong? Thks! S.
... View more
- Tags:
- aggregated route
- bgp
03-18-2020
08:23 AM
unfortunately, the rule seen in the result of CLI is not the same than in GUI, is it normal? ie. the rule which is matching the IPs source and destination in not the same
... View more
03-17-2020
01:15 AM
Thank you May I use this command for example : test security-policy-match source <source IP> destination <destination IP/netmask> protocol <protocol number> Or is there a better way for testing what is blocking by the security profile?
... View more
03-13-2020
08:20 AM
Hello Mayur, In the traffic logs I see traffic is matching with the rule Deny All and after is allowed Configuration of the security profile is : Antivirus profile = av_all Anti-Spyware Profile strict Vulnerability Protection Profile protec_all Thank you
... View more
03-12-2020
10:07 AM
Additionnal information, The same security profile is enabled on other security rules and do not cause any issue Thank you
... View more
03-12-2020
10:01 AM
Hello Community, Traffic is blocked by the Firewall Palo when security profile is enabled and need to disabled it to access to the destination server How can we solve this? Thanks! S
... View more
10-29-2019
10:00 AM
Hello, Thank you for your reply Are you talking about this topic : https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/adminguide/palo-alto.html ? We would like to make it work with PBF Thks!
... View more
10-29-2019
08:06 AM
Hello Community, I need help on this topic : How can I configure PBF to route VPN flow to AWS on PaloAlto Firewall? Thank you for help !
... View more
10-09-2019
01:44 AM
Hello, Is it possible to monitor which multicast traffic comes to management interface ? Thks
... View more
09-03-2019
05:24 AM
Hello Community, Could someone can help about the following topic? An internal app is still detected as a threat even if Verdict has been allowed in the first detection Thank you
... View more
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-03-2020
03:34 AM
|
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright 2007 - 2023 - Palo Alto Networks